“America well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own…she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom.” So cautioned John Quincy Adams on the Fourth of July in 1821.
Have generations of Americans since heeded the counsel of our sixth president?
It’s been three-quarters of a century since the Axis powers were defeated, nearly 30 years since the Iron Curtain was lifted, and 18 years since terrorists weaponized planes on U.S. soil, killing nearly 3,000 Americans. Today, America is neither entrenched in a great war, nor frozen in the kind of nuclear game of chicken that induced Baby Boomers to undergo fire drills that had them hiding under their elementary school desks. We are not anticipating another 9/11-style terrorist attack.
Yet the U.S. military is still operating in 40 percent of the nations of the world. It is has been engaged in nation-building efforts in Afghanistan for the better part of two decades. Some $5.9 trillion has been spent to fight the “war on terror” in that time only to see the pool of jihadists grow ever-larger. Little wonder that nearly half of Americans believe U.S. foreign policy over the last 20 years has made the country less safe.
The newest addition to the RealClearPublicAffairs family seeks to address and answer the profound questions raised by this experience: Is there a realistic alternative to this expansive, global military footprint? Would a different approach better ensure America’s security and prosperity? If America cannot be the world’s policeman, what grand strategy should guide U.S. foreign policy? The mission of these pages is to provide a curated and serious examination of these vital questions.
RealClearPublicAffairs is a new series of sponsored curation designed to provide coverage of important and trending public policy issues. More About
Bottom Line: Compared to veterans of previous wars, post-9/11 military veterans are more likely to have been deployed and seen combat, and thus more likely to have suffered the ment...
Bottom Line: While Iran does pose a threat to U.S. interests in the Middle East, it isn't a strong enough threat to justify U.S. intervention. If anything, U.S. intervention could ex...
Despite the immense costs in lives and treasure of this wider “forever war,” the U.S. government has allocated insufficient resources for its historical study, particularly records captured in the various phases and theaters of armed conflict. Congress and the Pentagon should revive and expand such efforts.
Bottom line: In 2020, Russia will likely release a new military doctrine that reflects its changing perception of foreign and domestic threats, as well as the nation's recent militar...